Cryptocurrency Legal Update: Hong Kong Court Grants Interim Proprietary Injunction over 999 Bitcoins

Lee ShihLeave a comment

The Hong Kong Court of First Instance in Yan Yu Ying v Leong Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 granted a temporary proprietary injunction to restrain 999 bitcoins (value close to US$50 million) being the subject matter of a dispute between the parties.

This case shows the consistent trend of Courts treating cryptocurrency such as Bitcoin as ‘property’ that can be subject to an injunction.

In this case, the Court granted what is known in Hong Kong as an “interim-interim injunction”.  It is similar to what is known in Malaysia as an ad interim injunction. It is a temporary measure to balance the fairness before the full arguments are heard on whether to grant the full interim injunction. Interim-interim injunctions or reliefs are a very short-term stop-gap measure.

Continue reading →

Case Update: Filing of Judicial Management Will Restrain Advertisement of Winding Up

Lee ShihLeave a comment

The Court of Appeal in Kumpulan Liziz Sdn Bjd (in liquidation) v Pembinaan Azam Jaya Sdn Bhd (grounds of judgment dated 25 November 2021) ruled that the judicial management moratorium will extend to restraining any advertisement or gazetting of a winding up petition.

Continue reading →

Largest Law Firms in Malaysia 2021

The Malaysian LawyerLeave a comment

We return with the 2021 edition of the largest law firms in Malaysia. You can also read the 2020 edition, the 2019 edition and our inaugural 2018 edition.

Like in previous editions, we refer to the number of lawyers based on the Malaysian Bar legal directory website as at the time of writing. We total up the number of lawyers for the law firm, including its branch offices.

Continue reading →

Ex Parte Appointment of Interim Judicial Manager over Khee San Food Industries

Lee ShihLeave a comment

On 19 November 2021, The Edge reported that the candy manufacturer, Khee San Food Industries Sdn Bhd (KSFI), has been placed under interim judicial management. KSFI is the wholly-owned subsidiary of the public-listed Khee San Bhd.

On 17 November 2021, the Court made an ex parte Order to appoint an interim judicial manager, Datuk Adam Primus Varghese Abdullah of Messrs ADAMPRIMUS, over KSFI. The interim judicial management of KSFI  in turn resulted in Khee San Bhd triggering Practice Note 17 (PN17). PN17 is essentially the financial distress criteria set by Bursa Malaysia Securities. KSFI’s assets account for over half of the total assets of Khee San on a consolidated basis.

I believe this is the first time a financial institution creditor has applied to place the debtor company under judicial management. I set out some of the guiding legal principles and the facts of this case.

Continue reading →

Case Update: Not Mandatory for Proposed Judicial Manager’s Affidavit

Lee ShihLeave a comment

The High Court in Re Federal Power Sdn Bhd (grounds of judgment dated 11 October 2021) granted a judicial management order over a high voltage cable manufacturing company. The Court dealt with the issue of whether the proposed judicial manager candidate must affirm an affidavit in support of the application or not.

Continue reading →

Case Update: Company Constitution Does Not Extend Indemnity for Directors

Lee ShihLeave a comment

The Court of Appeal in Perdana Petroleum Berhad v Tengku Dato’ Ibrahim Petra and others (grounds of judgment dated 15 October 2021) has ruled on a significant company law issue. Whether the company’s constitution alone can give rise to an indemnity by the company in favour of directors or former directors.

This decision will have an impact on company directors, auditors, company secretaries and other officers of the company attempting to rely on the indemnity clause contained in the constitution.

Continue reading →